- Survive
- Survival in Work and School
- By Any Means Necessary
- Truth Just Is: Justice
- A Swift War of Survival
- Ends Elsewhere
- Controversy
- –
Remember the Truth series? Suffering, simplifying, et. al?
Time to add to it.
Had planned to write a long thought-proof on why “the ends makes the means” is in close orbit to Truth. Instead, we start at base principles:
Survive
Similar to the content covered in what I know about business, for all things, survival is the end-all-be-all for, well, everything.
Nothing else matters until survival is guaranteed, no matter the means. All other ends, all other means, come secondary to the primal victory that is survival. The universe demands it:
- No texts may be written for a sun long snuffed out, but the survival of the heavy matter it birthed leads to life (arguably a step to the meaningful purpose of the universe, if not the end itself – that being conscious life).
- The thing that lives (by any means necessary) long enough to breed (again, by secondary means) survives on a genetic level to repeat the process.
The very fact of being capable of having this or counter thought is proof that survival by whatever means was required – if forbearers lacked the outcome of survival in any way, there is no way to think this end is anything but the ultimate course of everything.
Survival in Work and School
Whether being clever (i.e. cheating, reducing labor), charismatic (i.e. likeable, attractive), or strong (i.e. too good to ignore, confidence to impose will), succeeding at work and school and all other social ventures helps ensure one thing: genetic survival.
Schooling makes a person attractive and better prepared for work. Work gives a person resources by which they may support themselves, others, and afford social affirmations. Social cues of attractiveness (perceived intelligence, wealth, time spent in the care of grooming, et. al) brings others into a person’s orbit for the ultimate end: genetic survival.
By Any Means Necessary
There is… uncompassionate language all above. There will be more to come. Clearly there are statements of moral ambiguity.
This is true, as is the Truth: the end make the means.
Worthy of a post someday tying in ethics and suffering, morals are only those flexible, contextual considerations one can afford; any more and one’s naivete is taken advantage of, any less and one is ethically a monster, both routes a way to destruction.
Survival has a very tight budget on acceptable actions, and by nature Truth is morally ambiguous. Truth just is.
Truth Just Is: Justice
Justice seeks the Truth of a situation. By whatever means within the afforded morals of a society, justice is ideally the end from rational decisions based on factual and unbiased evidence. Just as Lady Justice is impartial within her blindfold, she is impartial to the morals or means of a situation: so long as the scales balance, justice has been done, the ends of society’s compact ensuring revenge for trespasses met.
Only after the ends of justice have been fulfilled do things like mercy or appeal come into effect. Mercy is a fickle secondary end to justice, a conscious balm to an idea of guilt for a systemic failing of society.
A Swift War of Survival
Speaking of an issue of society, a quick note on war.
For better or worse, war is. Should there be no war? For certain. That is an ideal, yes. Yet an imaginary one as it lies in the hypothetical future. We are only left with the Truth: war is.
So society must deal with war. Harking back to survival being the goal, no war exists if all participants are not crusading to facilitate the survival of themselves, their kin, or their ideologies (i.e. the governance of resources).
If one aims to remain ethical (i.e. do perhaps the only Good in the world: reduce net suffering), it behooves a society to make the ‘best’ of war, conduct a better war, a wholehearted effort. As Lady Justice’s sword of judgement is swift and final, better wars are swift, overwhelming, precise, and ultimately minimize suffering by guaranteeing the survival of a particular set of participants at the expense of another set.
Ends Elsewhere
Genetics, culture, justice, war – a few further explorations of the end making the means as a fundament of existence:
- Lessons of History outlines “good” being the thing that survives.
- In medicine, how few are the cures that cause more suffering than the disease. Radiological and chemical poisons, the cutting apart of skin and organs, pinpricks and pain – all to the benefit of the sick.
- Caught in a trap, which limb is so sacred it would not be taken off to save the entrapped?
- Wanting the body to feel or look or exist in a state it needs to, going through the wringer of exercise or emotional maturity or flexing mental growth (all hurtful) delivers the sought-for gains.
- Quality art is quality art, regardless of the means of production (e.g. AI). Just as a starving body cares not where the next calorie is derived, a glutton may dare turn up their nose for the merest slight. Only those with the capacity – the affordance after baser ends have been met – can judge on means rather than ends.
- Acting on one’s idea of ‘Love’ can do more net harm than benefit – this is the stuff of aberration and abuse.
- The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
- “Don’t do unto others what you don’t want done unto you.” – paraphrasing Confucius, the Anti-Golden Rule
- “Do or do not, there is no try.” – Yoda
Controversy
I attempt here to address the counter arguments I struggled with in dissecting that the end makes the means. This will be incomplete, so please add your own takes in the comments that we may wrestle with!
“How you do one thing is how you do everything.” This speaks to means – low quality effort, low quality outcome. The quote here assumes a linear A-to-B causation. Starting with the end in mind, B-to-* allows a person to walk-back the outcome to some starting point A required to achieve that outcome. With respect to the Oppenheimer movie in theaters at the time of writing, the end production of an atomic weapon justified every means leading up to the final product.
“Prior practice prevents poor performance.” More A-to-B thinking here. The goal is optimal performance – begin there, then practice (and quality practice at that!) is not directionless, but necessary. Only if ‘not poor performance’ is the goal can ‘prior practice’ be considered.
“Doing for the joy of it.” For the joy of it. Nothing done is done for the sake of the doing – there is an end, even if it is the sought-for positive feeling of action. (This applies to the learning of trivia or gathering of any excess.)
There is no, seemingly can be no, means without an end in mind. Can “the end makes the means” be reasonably controversial if the Truth of it just is?
–
The base principle of survival (an end that justifies itself) leads firmly to a Truth of existence: the end makes the means.
Nothing I have wracked my brain for or discovered in study concludes differently beyond reproach. I entertain the idea that perhaps when means would taint the end – something that could not be forgotten, washed away, a haunting of origin – then I see a possible discussion being had. Until then, this is the end of my exploration.
Always tentative when tackling a potentially touchy subject, give me a sanity check – how far off is this line of thinking? What was missed? I want to know because in the end, being Truthful is better than being “right” – an end worthy of whatever means.
Cheers ~